READING IS THAT FRUITFUL MIRACLE OF COMMUNICATION IN THE MIDST OF SOLITUDE. MARCEL PROUST Photography by Denise Blasor |
THE PRICE OF SILENCE
HOW MUCH are companies willing to spend to keep consumers
in the dark about their products?
in the dark about their products?
A lot.
Opponents of ballot measures to label foods containing genetically
modified ingredients in Colorado and Oregon spent a whopping
modified ingredients in Colorado and Oregon spent a whopping
$37 million to persuade voters in those states to vote against the
proposals.
The investment paid off; the measures were rejected at the ballot
box, which not only says something about the power of money
and advertising but also about the willingness of consumers to
remain ignorant about the products they consume.
proposals.
The investment paid off; the measures were rejected at the ballot
box, which not only says something about the power of money
and advertising but also about the willingness of consumers to
remain ignorant about the products they consume.
If one adds up what was spent to fight similar measures in
California and Washington state, "GMO labeling opponents
have spent more than $100 million in those four contests,"
according to the Wall Street Journal.
Colorado's Proposition 105 would have required labels on
packaged foods to include the text "produced with genetic
engineering." Under Measure 92 in Oregon, food labels would
have had to include the words "genetically engineered."
have had to include the words "genetically engineered."
Opponents attacked the labeling requirement as too cumbersome;
they argued it would lead to higher food costs, hurt farmers and
spread misinformation.
spread misinformation.
How adding some text on a label could possibly be curbensome
and result in higher food costs sounds like a stretch of the
imagination. Less of a stretch: the reason why big corporations
reject labeling efforts is plain, unadulterated fear that the GMO
acronym will turn consumers away from their products.
and result in higher food costs sounds like a stretch of the
imagination. Less of a stretch: the reason why big corporations
reject labeling efforts is plain, unadulterated fear that the GMO
acronym will turn consumers away from their products.
Which is totally foolish.
The very fact that most voters nixed the measures would seem
The very fact that most voters nixed the measures would seem
to suggest that full disclosure on food labels is not a priority
Sure, some consumers might be turned off by GMO products
but the vast majority won't even pay attention because of
any number of reasons. Any concern by food companies
that the labeling of GMO products will lead to a massive
downturn in sales is unjustified.
but the vast majority won't even pay attention because of
any number of reasons. Any concern by food companies
that the labeling of GMO products will lead to a massive
downturn in sales is unjustified.
If consumers really cared about what they put inside their
bodies they would not tolerate the current state of affairs in
which companies deny the public the right to know basic
information about the food products they sell.
It is interesting that companies are fighting to the death --
metaphorically speaking -- to keep those three little words,
GMO, off packaging and cans. God forbid that people should
know what those products contain: why it would be the end
of food producers!
If consumers really cared about what they consume, they would
go out of their way to stop buying the products of companies
opposed to GMO labeling like Pepsico, Coca Cola, Monsanto,
Kraft Foods, and General Mills.
If I don't have the right to know, then Mr. Big Company keep
your products, thank you very much.
It's as simple as that. But it won't happen.
which companies deny the public the right to know basic
information about the food products they sell.
It is interesting that companies are fighting to the death --
metaphorically speaking -- to keep those three little words,
GMO, off packaging and cans. God forbid that people should
know what those products contain: why it would be the end
of food producers!
If consumers really cared about what they consume, they would
go out of their way to stop buying the products of companies
opposed to GMO labeling like Pepsico, Coca Cola, Monsanto,
Kraft Foods, and General Mills.
If I don't have the right to know, then Mr. Big Company keep
your products, thank you very much.
It's as simple as that. But it won't happen.
☛ A SIMPLE TIP
DEAL OF THE WEEK $$ $
SAN JUAN -- The
holiday season is
nearly upon us and
with it the urge to party
and entertain. So if
you are in need of
new wine glasses,
head over to
Supermax De Diego
which brought
in a shipment of nice
looking, everyday wine
glasses. At $1.29 a
piece, plus tax, the
glasses are a very
good buy. Available
in long- stemmed and
short-stemmed styles.
"Feel Free" written on a wall in Old San Juan There is no reality without struggle, no future without battles. "The Man from Beijing" Henning Mankell |
DEAL OF THE WEEK $$ $
SAN JUAN -- The
holiday season is
nearly upon us and
with it the urge to party
and entertain. So if
you are in need of
new wine glasses,
head over to
Supermax De Diego
which brought
in a shipment of nice
looking, everyday wine
glasses. At $1.29 a
piece, plus tax, the
glasses are a very
good buy. Available
in long- stemmed and
short-stemmed styles.
ⓒ 2014 Lorraine Blasor All rights reserved✎
No comments:
Post a Comment